<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>EricEwe.com &#187; Super Affiliates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ericewe.com/tag/super-affiliates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ericewe.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 16:29:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Beyond Super Affiliate, Mega Affiliates and their relationship with retailers</title>
		<link>http://www.ericewe.com/online-marketing/beyond-super-affiliate-mega-affiliates-and-their-relationship-with-retailers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ericewe.com/online-marketing/beyond-super-affiliate-mega-affiliates-and-their-relationship-with-retailers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 17:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affiliate Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cj]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mega Affiliates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Affiliates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ericewe.com/?p=429</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have been in the affiliate realm for quite some time and I have seen a lot of changes, from the rise and fall of cookie stuffing affiliates to networks imploding. Within the last 3 years, I have seen a surge in not just super affiliates like Fatwallet, SlickDeals but rather what I would call [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.ericewe.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/buy.gif"></a>I have been in the affiliate realm for quite some time and I have seen a lot of changes, from the rise and fall of cookie stuffing affiliates to networks imploding. Within the last 3 years, I have seen a surge in not just super affiliates like Fatwallet, SlickDeals but rather what I would call <strong>MEGA Affiliates </strong>that make those super affiliates look like dwarfs.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong, in order to reach a status of a super affiliate, that particular affiliate should be driving a substantial amount of traffic to the retailer and generating a decent revenue. Commission Juction categorizes larger affiliates as &#8220;Top Performers&#8221; and it order to qualify, one must have a CJ Marketplace account and have been paid at least $10,000 USD in commissions per month for the last three months.</p>
<p>Over the last 3 years, companies that are typically merchants are getting into the affiliate game. A good example is DiscoverCard. They came storming into the scene and in 2007, Discover was recognized as the &#8220;Best New Affiliate&#8221; in the Linkshare Golden Links Award in NYC on June 19, 2007. It is no surprise that they are not only a super affiliates but Mega affiliates with their millions of DiscoverCard customer. One of their biggest angle is to offer a CASH BACK to the consumer for their purchase by clicking through the Mega affiliate&#8217;s link. Another notable Mega Affiliate is Bing which is supported by Microsoft.</p>
<p>What really puzzles me is the fact that the retailers have with these Mega Affiliates. Yes, it is imperative to have a relationship with them but at what cost? If you are paying your public affiliates 2% on all goods bought on your website and you offer these Mega affiliates more than 10% commission, where is the logic behind this? I have worked at an electronics retailer and competition is fierce and consumers are not only price sensitive, most tech savvy consumers will scour the ends of the world to save a penny. Thus, one is often squeezed by manufacturers to be competitive. I noticed that there was an electronics retailer offering 10% cash back to Bing&#8217;s users when they purchased through Bing&#8217;s links.</p>
<p><img class="align right" title="Bing Cash Back offered by Wal-Mart" src="http://www.ericewe.com/images/wal-mart-bing.bmp" alt="" width="264" height="189" />Today, I noticed that Wal-Mart is offering 20%. Yes, 20% on Bing.com. If you do some quick math, 20% is basically 1/5 off on a product. On Average, they are offering 1%-4% through their affiliate program on Linkshare and have been constantly shaving commission via their Linkshare program. So if Bing.com is able to offer 20% kick back to their customer base, then either Wal-Mart is offering at least 20% or Bing is subsidizing 16-19% on each transaction for their customer base.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s look at this in a logical way, I am a firm believer in rewarding for performance but not to the extend where it cuts into your profit margin. In the long run, this is not a sustainable strategy where the merchant will bleed to death. And if the Mega affiliate is dumping money to promote a merchant, that is a great relationship for the merchant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ericewe.com/online-marketing/beyond-super-affiliate-mega-affiliates-and-their-relationship-with-retailers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

